Can Trump Really Get Away with Firing 17 Independent Watchdogs?

 

President Donald Trump made a shocking move on Friday night, firing at least 17 independent watchdogs, also known as inspectors general, from multiple federal agencies ¹. These watchdogs play a crucial role in overseeing the government and rooting out corruption. Sources close to the matter revealed that discussions about removing these watchdogs began during Trump's transition back to the White House.

While the president does have the authority to fire inspectors general, there are rules in place to ensure accountability. For instance, the president must notify Congress 30 days in advance and provide a detailed explanation for the firing. However, it appears that Trump's administration did not follow this protocol, with Senator Chuck Grassley stating that Congress was not given the required 30-day notice.

One notable exception to the firings is Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who did not receive notice of his termination as of yesterday evening. Horowitz, an Obama appointee, has issued reports critical of both the Trump and Biden administrations.

The implications of these firings are significant, with many expressing concerns about the potential for corruption and abuse of power. Senator Grassley emphasized the importance of inspectors general being independent of political pressure and ensuring that the law is enforced and money is spent appropriately.

Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer was more blunt in his assessment, stating that the firings are a possible violation of federal law and that Trump is "terrified of accountability and hostile to facts and transparency."

As the situation continues to unfold, one thing is clear: the firing of these watchdogs has sparked a heated debate about accountability, transparency, and the rule of law.